Req 8b — Stove Types

Choosing the right camp stove depends on your trip type, group size, weather conditions, and personal preferences. Each stove type has strengths and trade-offs.

Canister Stoves (Upright)

The most popular choice for backpackers and Scout camping. A lightweight burner screws directly onto a pressurized fuel canister.

Advantages:

• Extremely easy to use — screw on, turn the valve, light
• Precise flame control for simmering
• No priming, no spills, no mess
• Very lightweight and compact

Disadvantages:

• Performance drops in cold weather (below 20°F) as canister pressure decreases
• Cannot tell how much fuel remains in a canister
• Canisters are not refillable and create waste
• Less stable — the stove sits on top of a narrow canister

Liquid Fuel Stoves

Reliable workhorses that burn white gas or multiple fuel types. Used by serious backpackers and winter campers.

Advantages:

• Excellent cold-weather performance — liquid fuel is not affected by temperature
• Refillable fuel bottles — you carry only the fuel you need
• Can burn multiple fuel types (multi-fuel models), useful for international travel
• Very powerful heat output

Disadvantages:

• Require priming (pre-heating) before use, which takes practice
• More complex to operate — pumping, priming, and adjusting
• Heavier and bulkier than canister stoves
• Risk of fuel spills and flare-ups during priming
• Require regular maintenance (cleaning the fuel jet, replacing O-rings)

Alcohol Stoves

Ultra-simple stoves that burn denatured alcohol. Popular with ultralight backpackers.

Advantages:

• Almost no weight — some are made from a single soda can
• No moving parts — nothing to break or maintain
• Fuel is inexpensive and widely available (hardware stores, gas stations)
• Nearly silent operation

Disadvantages:

• Very slow — significantly longer boil times than other stove types
• Difficult to simmer or control flame
• Flame is nearly invisible in daylight — easy to burn yourself or knock over without realizing it is lit
• Poor performance in wind — requires a windscreen
• Not practical for group cooking

Solid Fuel Stoves

Burn compressed fuel tablets (like Esbit). The simplest stove design possible.

Advantages:

• Lightest stove option — the “stove” is often just a folding metal stand
• Fuel tablets are lightweight, waterproof, and have a long shelf life
• No spills, no leaks, no priming

Disadvantages:

• Very slow and low heat output
• No flame control — the tablet burns until it is gone
• Leaves a sticky residue on pots
• Not practical for cooking real meals — best for boiling water only
• Strong odor when burning

Wood-Burning Stoves

Small stoves designed to burn twigs, pinecones, and other natural fuel found at camp.

Advantages:

• Free fuel — you gather it at your campsite
• No fuel canisters or bottles to carry or dispose of
• Satisfying campfire-like cooking experience
• Some models generate electricity from heat to charge devices

Disadvantages:

• Requires dry wood, which may not be available in wet conditions
• Produces smoke and soot that blackens pots
• Requires constant attention to feed fuel
• Not allowed in many wilderness areas during fire bans
• Slower and less predictable than gas stoves

Which Stove Is Right for Your Trip?