3. Crime in Your Community

Analyzing Your Research

3b.
Record notes on which law enforcement agencies and courts were involved in the pursuit of justice for the victims and the accused person, why you think these crimes were committed, and what could be done to prevent similar crimes. Review your research with your counselor.

Now it’s time to think critically about the three crimes you researched in Req 3a. This requirement asks you to move beyond “what happened” and dig into “who responded,” “why did it happen,” and “how could it have been prevented.”

Identifying the Agencies Involved

For each of your three crimes, identify every law enforcement agency and court that played a role. Remember the different levels you learned about in Requirement 2:

Law enforcement agencies to look for:

  • Local police or sheriff’s department — Usually the first responders for local crimes
  • State police or highway patrol — Often involved in crimes on state highways or crimes crossing county lines
  • Federal agencies (FBI, DEA, ATF, Secret Service) — Involved when crimes cross state lines, involve federal laws, or are particularly large-scale
  • Specialized units — Cybercrime units, fraud divisions, environmental enforcement agencies

Courts to identify:

  • Municipal or district courts — Handle misdemeanors and initial hearings
  • Superior or circuit courts — Handle felony trials
  • Federal courts — Handle federal crimes
  • Juvenile courts — Handle cases involving minors
  • Appeals courts — Handle cases where a conviction is challenged

Analyzing Why the Crimes Were Committed

This is the heart of your analysis. For each crime, think about the factors that may have contributed. Refer back to the list of reasons from Requirement 1:

  • Economic pressure or financial desperation
  • Substance abuse or addiction
  • Peer pressure or gang involvement
  • Opportunity (something was easy to steal or no one was watching)
  • Anger, revenge, or emotional impulse
  • Greed or desire for power
  • Mental health challenges

Most crimes involve more than one factor. A burglary, for example, might involve both economic pressure and opportunity (an unlocked door in an unlit neighborhood). A white collar crime might stem from both greed and the belief that “everyone does it.”

Proposing Prevention Strategies

For each crime, think about what could have been done to prevent it — or to prevent similar crimes in the future. Use the Crime Triangle framework:

Reduce Motivation

  • Better economic opportunities, education, and youth programs
  • Substance abuse prevention and treatment
  • Anti-gang intervention programs
  • Mental health services

Harden the Target

  • Better locks, lighting, and security systems
  • Cybersecurity measures (strong passwords, two-factor authentication)
  • Inventory controls and loss prevention in retail
  • Environmental monitoring and enforcement

Strengthen the Guardian

  • Neighborhood Watch programs and community engagement
  • Security cameras and alarm systems
  • More community policing and foot patrols
  • Bystander intervention training

Analysis Notes Template

Complete this for each of your three crimes
  • Crime summary: What happened? (3–4 sentences)
  • Agencies involved: Which law enforcement agencies responded or investigated?
  • Courts involved: Where was the case heard? What type of court?
  • Motivation analysis: Why do you think this crime was committed?
  • Prevention ideas: What could have prevented this specific crime?
  • Broader prevention: What would prevent similar crimes in the future?
A triangular diagram showing the Crime Triangle with three vertices labeled Motivated Offender, Suitable Target, and Absence of Guardian
FBI Crime Data Explorer Search and explore national crime data by state, agency, and crime type to support your research. Link: FBI Crime Data Explorer — https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/